Built to support HGIOS 4 QI 2.3, in Education Scotland’s evaluative language

Hear the lesson back,through a coach's ear.

A teacher records a lesson. Second Listen hands back the four or five moments worth thinking about, in the language of HGIOS 4 QI 2.3. Nothing is scored, and nobody else sees it.

Built in the UK. Your lessons never leave it. For Scottish local authorities and their schools. The demo needs a code, ask us for one.

Assessment for Learning
1 of 3
“Whiteboards up. Show me a fraction that’s the same as three quarters. … I can see sixes and eights, and a couple of fours. Hold on to that.”

Every pupil answered at once, and you read the spread of answers before moving on, which showed you who had the idea and who needed the next step.

Worth sitting withWhat did the couple of fours tell you, and what did you do with it next?

Hinge question · Black & Wiliam, 1998 · expert synthesis

Never leaves the UKNothing is scoredOnly the teacher sees it

Example moments from a made-up P6 fractions lesson.

Self-evaluation runs on lesson evidence. There's rarely enough.

Observation is rare

A few formal visits a year, and they feel high-stakes for everyone in the room.

Reflection gets squeezed

After a full day, few teachers have the time or a second pair of ears to look back on a lesson.

Figures miss the lesson

School and authority data rarely reaches what actually happened in classrooms.

One recording. A reflection, not a grade.

  1. 01

    Record it

    On a school PC in the browser, or on your phone signed in with a QR code.

  2. 02

    It listens

    The lesson is read against eight indicators drawn from HGIOS 4 QI 2.3. Then the audio is deleted.

  3. 03

    You read it back

    One moment at a time, in your own words, with a question worth sitting with.

  4. 04

    Plan a next step

    If you like, plan one next step, try it for a week or two, then look back.

Made for the end of a teaching day.

No forms, no targets, no marks. Teachers read one moment at a time and decide what, if anything, to do with it.

  • Reflections stay private. School leaders and the local authority never see them.
  • Research that fits the moment. Every suggestion comes from a checked source, labelled for what kind of evidence it is.
  • Ready for PRD. Export a reflective cycle as a PDF for Professional Update conversations.
What?So what?Now what?Look back

Now trying

After a ‘why’ question, count to five before taking an answer, then ask a second pupil to add to the first.

What I noticed: I asked ‘who can tell me why?’ and answered it myself before anyone had a chance.

Look back in 6 days

Export for PRD

Patterns across the school. Never a person.

A whole-school picture for self-evaluation and your improvement plan, in Education Scotland’s evaluative language you already use: most, a majority, a few.

What leaders never see

  • A lesson, a recording or a quote from one
  • A teacher's reflection or what they chose to try
  • Who has recorded a lesson, or how often

Rowanlea Primary

46 lessons analysed · 14 staff joined

Learning and engagement

Climate for learning
Most
Tasks that meet needs
Minority
Learning approaches
Most

Quality of teaching

Purposeful dialogue
Majority
Assessment for Learning
Majority

Effective use of assessment

Learning conversations
Majority

Share of lessons with clear evidence of each indicator, never a share of staff. Shown once five staff have joined. Two further indicators not shown here.

Grounded in research. Honest about it.

Every suggestion comes from a bank of 41 teaching approaches drawn from 29 sources, each checked against the original publication. The AI chooses from the bank. It cannot write a citation of its own.

The 29 sources, by kind of evidence

Peer-reviewed studies8
EEF evidence summaries6
Expert syntheses6
Meta-analyses5
Conceptual frameworks3
Randomised trial1

Expert synthesis, not peer-reviewed

Hinge question

A single question the whole class answers at once, on whiteboards, hands or fingers, shows the spread of understanding rather than sampling one pupil, and decides what happens next.

The caveat, shown to teachers

A review rather than a trial, and its aggregation of effect sizes has been criticised (Bennett, 2011). The often quoted ‘six or seven months’ figure should not be treated as an independently established effect.

Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.

25 of the 29 sources carry a caveat like this, and some question the approach they support.

Black & Wiliam, 1998Rowe, 1986Hattie & Timperley, 2007Sadler, 1989Mercer, Wegerif & Dawes, 1999Clarke, 2014Rosenshine, 2012EEF Teaching and Learning Toolkit

Read the research behind Second Listen

Built in the UK. Your lessons never leave it.

Every step a lesson goes through happens in the United Kingdom, from the recording to the reflection.

Audio gone in seconds

Transcribed by Microsoft in the UK, which keeps none of it. Deleted the moment it is transcribed; the transcript goes as soon as the lesson is read.

  • Removed after 14 days

    A lesson's moments are deleted automatically, unless the teacher keeps them a little longer for a reflective cycle.

  • Nothing is scored

    No grades, ratings or rankings of teachers, anywhere in the product.

  • No passwords

    Staff sign in with a code sent to their own work email, protected by the school’s own mailbox security.

In the language you already useHGIOS 4, QI 2.3Your learning and teaching policyPRD and Professional UpdateEducation Scotland’s evaluative language

More detail in our questions and answers.

See how it would work in your authority.

A half-hour conversation and a look at the demo together.

Or email contact@secondlisten.co.uk